Having the Best of Both Worlds

Yvonne Tagoe
You come to Canada, to work, to go to school, or for some other reason. You come from a country very far away where things are done differently, people speak a different language and look different. You are called an immigrant or a visible minority or perhaps both

 

Language and Fitting In
April / May 1992

What is language? Without giving it a strict dictionary definition, we can safely talk of a method of expression, and a very important form of identity of a group of people. Language helps us to communicate very easily and helps facilitate understanding. Someone described it as a barrier and a badge. It is a barrier when we find ourselves in a situation where we are unable to communicate through speech with the people around us. It is a badge when we are able to do so, just like showing a badge as a means of identification, making it easy for one to fit in.

How will it feel to be an immigrant in an environment where you cannot understand the language? Wouldn’t it almost feel like being deaf and dumb?  There are other things one has to cope with in a new country, such as the culture of the people, the weather, and even the simple idea of being in a new surrounding. The inability to speak the language is then one of many problems, yet it is a major one.

The first thing people want to do when they get into a new environment is to try and settle down as quickly as possible. It will definitely take longer if the language is a barrier. Simple things can become setbacks and cause a lot of frustration. This lack of understanding can prolong the process of culture shock and make one uneasy most of the time.

This state of uneasiness can result in embarrassment and anxiety, causing the immigrant to react in different ways. One of the ways will be to build a small world and stay in it; but how long can one function effectively in this ‘small world’?

Coming out of this ‘world’ into the real world or the foreign environment requires a conscious effort on the part of the immigrant, and it will be an action which will not be regretted. Taking that first step may initially require a push from a family member or someone from the country of origin. The process of learning and adjusting will next have to be tackled, which, like most things in life, has its ups and downs, but which pays off eventually.

When the language, which had been a barrier, is converted into a badge, the new immigrant is on the way to understanding what is happening all around, and is ready to overcome the culture shock, and the feeling of being lost.

Suddenly, all the things that did not make sense, will become meaningful. When people speak it will no longer sound like noise, but rather it will be intelligible words that can be put together and processed. At this point the immigrant begins to feel a strong sense of identity and belonging to the new world, and the door is now open for integration into the society

 

Having the Best of both Worlds
June / July 1992

Maybe you came with your wife, and the two of you decide to start a family here in the future. You face so many ‘not so pleasant’ situations, but you decide to take things one day at a time. You miss your home country, but then you find opportunities here that you may not have had back home. You find some values here that you appreciate and would like to add to the values back home that you still hold on to. You still can’t help missing home because there are certain values at home you just can’t find here.

Sometimes you feel that you can’t find acceptance and you can’t find closeness, you have friends here but even when they get close it doesn’t feel like the closeness back home. You begin to wonder if it is in your imagination, or whether you are unconsciously holding back, apprehensive about giving your all. You try hard to make adjustments, taking on the values here that you like and at the same time holding on to values at home, you try to see if you can have the best of both worlds.

So you eventually start a family and your child starts growing in this environment, which is the only one he/she knows. You vow in your heart to instill in your child at every opportunity the values you brought from your home country, of course in addition to some of the values you find here. You vow that your child will have the best of both worlds. (By this time you have done your best in adjusting). You are jolted back to reality when your child comes home from school, looking puzzled, and perhaps sad and asks, “Daddy, Mummy, why am I different?” or “why do I have a strange name that nobody can pronounce?”, and probably threatens to change his name. He may also ask why the other kids pick on him. How do you explain to your child and make him understand that there can be something special about being different, something to be proud of, or that people are basically the same everywhere? How do you explain to him that a name identifies a person and that in your home country this name has a special meaning, that changing his name will not change who he is or what he looks like. How can you make him understand that kids pick on kids everywhere?

Your child may even tease you about your limited vocabulary and your ‘funny’ accent, because most likely your mother tongue is still interfering with the way you speak English. Since your child ‘talks Canadian’ there is the tendency for him to feel superior and will sometimes tell you to “get with it” when it comes to certain habits he is trying to adopt.

How are you going to handle it? Are you going to dote on the child and praise him for being so fluent in English or are you going to try hard to let him appreciate his ‘roots’, and that, it is the inner person that matters and not a person’s looks or way of speaking? Are you even going to attempt to teach this child some words and sentences in your mother tongue or is it really not necessary?

While the family is watching television there is a program on the developing world and there is a focus on your home country. The program will most likely be about problems in the developing world. Let’s say your child reacts in disgust at seeing, for example, poor living conditions; are you going to let it pass or will you tell your child that those are his people too? He will most likely protest vehemently. Would you go further to explain to that child in the best possible way, that he should not look down on those people, or anybody else for that matter? That they are not subhuman, but human beings like everybody else, that they have values, a culture, an identity. How are you going to fight this battle against your child’s belief system in the mind of that child without making him more confused than he already is?

For the immigrant parent this is an added task to the already enormous task of parenting.

As immigrants how do we let our children know that they stand the chance of having the best of both worlds .. or does it really matter? .. Let’s think about what we tell our children …

P.S. The ‘he’ I used for the child is generic.

things Turkish

It’s a Psychic Fair Every Day ..
April / May 1992

Meltem Yakula Kurtman

“What says my fortune today?”
“Oh, I had the most interesting dream last night. Where is that dream dictionary?”
“My ears are ringing, someone must be talking about me”
These are probably the most popular topics of casual conversation between family members and close friends in a Turkish household.

While in North America people are only now beginning to accept the inexplicable, out-of-the-ordinary occurences, generally classified as ‘psychic phenomena’; Psychic phenomena is an everyday occurence that Turks have been living with for centuries.

The most popular form of psychic reading is the Turkish coffee cup.  This very entertaining ritual is done several times a day, perhaps every time they have a cup of coffee.

Turkish coffee is brewed and served in a very unique way. It is prepared in a small saucepan-like pot where the coffee, water and maybe sugar is boiled over a hot plate. The coffee is ready to be served when a froth forms on the top and rises. In this way, the coffee grinds are part of the liquid which later settles at the bottom of the serving cup. It is the coffee residue which forms shapes in the cup and is read either for fun or for very serious consideration, depending on who is reading and who is listening.

The coffee is read somewhat like the European tea leaves, but the cup must be turned upside-down and allowed to drain and dry. Every Turkish home has at least one resident psychic, sometimes the whole family is learned in the ways of coffee cup readings. In that case one must politely inquire who is the best reader before having one’s cup read.

As far as their beloved Turkish coffee and its psychic readings go, the Turkish people are very accepting. The skeptics are non-existent in this department. There is a very popular Turkish proverb that says “Do not believe in fa’l (fortune telling), but do not do without it” meaning to say: take it with a grain of salt .. yes it is very entertaining and people don’t want to do without it, but also practice your free will and create your own fortune or destiny.

Turks love to interpret their dreams almost as much as they love reading their fortune from the coffee cup. They all have at least one well used dream dictionary. In the old days, people often visited the local hoja (wiseman), if they thought that their dream had an important message that needed professional interpretation.

Last night’s dreams are daily discussed at breakfast, for the dreamer may need to understand the message conveyed and possibly use it in the day that awaits him or her.

The prophetic type of dreams are the ones people enjoy the most. For example if someone dreams that he is fishing in a clean, clear water lake and he happens to be catching a lot of fish .. this is interpreted as a sign for good things to come .. he will certainly be in good spirits!

Whether the prophecy comes from a cup or from the subconscious mind, the Turks love and enjoy speculating on them. In fact one might say its their favourite pass-time

Home Sweet “Turkish” Home
June / July 1992

It sure has a nice ring to it, don’t you think? It sparks images of many pleasurable scenes: A pot simmering on the stove, mouth watering aromas floating from the kitchen all the way down to the hall, mom baking her goodies, grandma knitting a cardigan, kids running in the backyard, and maybe grandpa rocking in his chair on the front porch happily observing the passers-by.

Home, family and hearth: these are probably the most important parts of the Turkish culture. In fact, one might even call it the holy trinity. Faith in God comes first, faith in the family comes right after. The bond that holds the family together is stronger than any other.

Traditionally, father was the provider, but this is fast changing now. Most households need two incomes hence mother west to work; but she has no regrets. She is out teaching, banking, lawyering or doctoring .. but this only makes her more special. Not only is she the source of all love, but she is also a provider. Of course she gets plenty of help with the housework and the children. Grandma is there for her, keeping an eye on the kids, while she is at work and doing most of the house chores and still managing to have a warm supper waiting on the table when the family gets home at night.

Everyone is grateful for the presence of everyone else. There is great love and never-ending respect among the family members. Each allows space for the other to grow and flourish, and they all fit together very much like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. No piece overlaps the other, therefore no toes are stepped on.

Families don’t always live together. Mostly every family has its own household, sometimes the families are separated by cities, sometimes they are separated by an ocean, but the bond that holds them together is always there.

They share their joy and sorrow.  If it’s a happy occasion, they laugh together. “The more the merrier” is definitely applicable here. If there is a problem they solve it together. “Two heads are better than one“, how true ! Is there a financial problem? Well, the family piggy bank requires no co-signers, and the terms of the loan are in favour of the borrower. What better deal can one ask for? Has there been an untimely death? A member left without a spouse, with young ones to care for? he or she will get all the help that’s needed: financial and emotional support, mom’s shoulder to lean on, and oodles of love to carry him/her till the tragedy settles and blows over. Family is always there.

The concept of family is definitely synergic. The whole is many times stronger than its parts singlely added together.

Together the family is strong and vibrates with the energy of timeless love continuing it into eternity.

Portuguese page

My Portuguese School
April / May 1992
by Irene Ribeiro
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Because Canada is a multicultural nation, it was found that more and more people wanted to preserve their cultural background and most of all their language. The Heritage program was designed to respond to the needs of the numerous communities that appealed to this fact.

This program now has classes in more than 36 languages. In the Kitchener-Waterloo area there are a diversity of languages being taught through the Heritage program, one of them is the Portuguese. This program is offered on Saturday mornings at St. Joseph elementary school. We have classes that go from junior kindergarten to grade 6. Our numbers are increasing year after year, parents believe that their children need an education in their ancestral language also. Most of the children do not like the idea of waking up early every Saturday morning and missing their favourite cartoons, but this concept changes as they grow older.

At the Portuguese program, the proper teaching of the language and culture is an aspect that is very stressed. Our staff consist of 15 teachers, volunteers, and a supervisor. These are really dedicated people who give their maximum so the program can run smoothly. This program owes most of its success within the Portuguese community, to Mr. Inacio Mota, who is the Assistant Supervisor and is responsible for its “booming” and rejuvenation.

Portugal Day : The Origin of June 10th
June / July 1992
by Irene Ribeiro
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

When celebrating one more Portugal’s Day in this year of 1992, it is appropriate to remember the why of Portugal, Camoes, and the Portuguese Communities’ Day.

During Portuguese Communities’ Day, Camoes is simultaneously a symbol of unity: the unity of the people whose ancestral language is Portuguese.

Camoes, himself a foreign Portuguese, an emigrant, an exile, never forgot his origins and immortalized the deeds of his country – Portugal – through his greatest work Os Lusiadas. Camoes became the symbol of national pride in many different moments of the Portuguese history and this fact has been unchanging throughout the centuries.

With June the 10th, Camoes appears as the patron of one nation, of a people, and the mirror of Portugal, the highest symbol of its citizens, even of the ones that left their country, the emigrants, the foreign Portuguese, the exiled or the children of Portuguese who never forgot their roots. The Portugal, Camoes, and Portuguese Communities’ Day signifies, without a doubt, what is the most profound and noble feeling that touches the heart of the Portuguese, since it honours the ‘land of birth’, the culture that represents us in the world and the nation divided that is the thousands of Portuguese spread throughout the world. Because of this fact, this day is extended to all the Portuguese communities that can be found everyone in the globe. It is within the communities of emigrants, in all five continents, that June 10th is more traditionally rooted as a festivity than in Portugal.

The celebrations are still being held with the same ardour as three decades ago, when the communities were still in embryo.

In Kitchener, this festivity is not only a simple official homage imposed by the calendar, but it reached a projection worthy of recognition with the Portuguese-Canadians.

Portuguese communities dispersed throughout the earth are living and dynamic witnesses of the wisdom of life and adaptation to new lands and new people. Without damaging their participation in the welcoming society, in this case Canada, the Portuguese race also contributes to the betterment and strengthening of an identity that the country has not stopped looking for.

Multiculturalism !!

Multiculturalism
April / May 1992

by Anthony Antoniadis

Firstly, let us examine what the word culture means. For this I quote from Webster’s dictionary which states that culture is:

“the acquired ability of an individual or a people to recognize and appreciate generally accepted esthetic and intellectual excellence; the esthetic and intellectual achievement of civilization; a particular state or stage of civilization, as in the case of certain nation or period; as Chinese culture, etc., anthropology, sociology, the total of human behaviour patterns and technology communicated from generation to generation”.

Multiculturalism therefore means to be acquainted with a number of cultures of different race, nationality or religion than yours; to obtain knowledge of their culture; to respect their customs and, in many cases, to borrow and follow the good aspects (because, as in everything else in life, there are positive and negative aspects of every culture).

One must accept the fact that humans are all the same, having the same abilities of mind and body, regardless of skin colour and body structure.

Once you embrace multiculturalism by admitting that it is not just your own race, nationality or religion that is best, you will realize that all people have more or less the same principles of goodness and the same vices.

Once you are bold and bright enough to accept the above facts, you will have no difficulty working, associating and fraternizing with all peoples, regardless of cultural background. You will feel pleasure and satisfaction as you realize that your knowledge and scope of life has extended further than your own borders of racial or national culture.

Accepting multiculturalism enables one to live peacefully and happily with all people.

Circassia: The Land . . . The People . . .

Circassia: The Land . . . The People . . .

by Hesham Sabry

Suddenly horsemen weilding swords came charging down the mountain side.  The Russian Tsarist soldiers dismounted, loaded their guns, took aim and fired. Down came the front line of Circassian horses and men, but the charge on the Russian invaders who had been trying to conquer them for the past fifty years did not stop. Once more though greatly outnumbered by the Russian army units, the Cherkess tribesmen, defending their homeland routed the enemy.

One more victory in their futile struggle to halt their giant northern neighbour from subjugating them, a giant who had already conquered every other land surrounding them, so that in the end, they alone remained an island within the great mass that is Russia, an island that was not going to be tolerated under any cicumstances.

Over the past fifty years, the rest of the Caucasus had either succumbed or surrendered to the Russians; the people of the region were tired of fighting a seemingly inexhaustible enemy that kept coming back with larger forces, always better and more heavily armed; and some southern Caucasus states invited the Russians to take them over in order to protect them from other invaders; but as yet the Russians had been unable to spread their rule over those fierce fighters to the north, the Circassians .. who had no cannons, and still fought mostly with daggers and swords! Only towards the end of the war were they using guns.

Since the late eighteenth century, the Russians began occupying the Cherkess northern range, who, unwilling to submit, were forced further and further into their mountainous southern range, where they teemed up with the other remaining tribes to continue their resistance.

By the early ninteenth century the Russians were so frustrated by their failures that they took to systematically wasting the land, burning villages and crops, driving herds and massacring any women and children who happened to be in the way; to the extent that even the Tsar sent his objection to his generals over such savagery.

Circassia, the land of the Cherkess, is an area that before its Russian annexation, just over a century ago, had extended from the Caucasus mountains, across the plains and over the Kuban river to the north, neighbouring the Crimean Tartars. To the west lay the Black Sea, to the east the Chechens, who also continued to resist the Russians.

By the late 1830’s the Russians scored several major victories on the Chechen and believed that that was the end of the resistance of all the mountain peoples. The Russian general, Velyaminov, sent assurances to the Tsar Nicholas I that all was under control and that the Caucasus was at last under Russian rule. Little did he know that it was to be another thirty years before his words could be truly accomplished.

The Chechens took up arms under a new leader, the Imam Shamyl, who was even more determined than his fallen predecessor to stop the Russians; and along with the Circassians, continued to defy and defeat the forces sent against them, and to suffer heavy losses that no small population could endure for very long; and yet the Chechen resistance under Shamyl lasted till 1859.

The Circassians, though having lost a valuable ally in the Chechens, continued to struggle on for five more years, till their final capitulation in 1864.

Many Chechen and Circassians preferred to die than to surrender, remaining in their blazing houses with their families to die; they died as they lived, refusing to submit to foreign dominion.

That same year 1864, saw a massive exodus of over half a million Circassians who refused to remain under Russian rule and left for Mediterranean countries and the Balkans.

The Russians were determined to wipe Circassia off the map. After half a century of enduring such losses, just to conquer those peoples, and a land that they had completely surrounded, now took it out on those who remained.  Many were relocated in areas within Russia – much as had been done to the Crimean Tatars because they too had put up a prolonged resistance – others were displaced by Russians from the north who took over their lands and fields.

Circassians are presently represented by three enclaves considered to be part of modern Russia, with no political power.

The Chechens, of such a small population and area, and who had so valiantly fought the Russians, are the first region within Russia proper to have declared their independence. They have after all retained their free spirit!

Lately the Tattars (Tartars) of Tattarestan became the second region within Russia proper to declare independence. I wonder, will the Cherkess, the last people to be conquered by Tsarist Russia, ever again be free?

To most, some obscure tiny land so far away, may mean nothing. But for one whose Circassian ancestors were decimated fighting the Russians for decades and whose remaining kin in 1864 emigrated to Egypt, this means a whole lot.

A Word of Lament

A Word of Lament
by Harbour Chan
April / May 1992

I wrote about myself in the Dragon Post of the University of Waterloo.  The message was:
I feel proud of being Chinese, but I also feel ashamed for the same reason

From the May 4 Uprising to the June 4 Massacre, the Chinese people have suffered many natural disasters.

Not long ago, I heard one of the Chinese people proudly saying to his Canadian friend, “China has a long civilization- its architecture and science has contributed to many modern development of nowadays.” What a typical Chinese! He only remembers those successes, but said nothing about those other things. Rather he buries those shameful incidents well under the ground.

Besides, when you look back into the brilliant past age of China, and compare it with the present one, how do you feel about nowadays? China at present is considered a developing country. Is this the fact that makes us feel proud of ourselves? It is time for us, Chinese, to face the reality. Wake Up!

The character of arrogance and haughtiness found in these Chinese people best explains why China is one of the weakest and poorest countries in the world. This is most evident in the Chinese history when the emperors or the politicians ignored their people’s well-being, and sought their own satisfactions.

As Hong Kong will become part of China after 1997, its people are so scared that they try every means to leave.

Those same people had once been overwhelmed by the fact that they were born in Hong Kong, but now …. I think that we should not leave our country when it encounters difficulty, or else how can we strengthen it?

Come On ! Do not let others look down on us as a slump of sand. Let us co-operate and be strong, hand in hand, heart with heart, to construct and prepare for our future. It is in our hands. So please give up the arrogance and haughtiness, and wake up from your dream!

Eid No – Rooz

Eid No – Rooz
by Rana M.
April / May 1992

Spring is the time that life starts all over again, it is the time of blossom, the time to breathe and feel the freshness.

In Iran spring means feast and celebration, and Iranians have been celebrating the first day of spring, March 21st, for thousands of years.

They call it Eid No-Rooz. Eid means feast, No means new, and Rooz is day; so it means “the feast of new day”; in fact, Eid No-Rooz is the national new year, and is the biggest celebration in Iran, in which everybody participates regardless of their religion.

Eid No Rooz is also celebrated in Afghanistan; and very recently, after the Soviet Union fell apart, Tajikestan, one of its former republics, announced No-Rooz as the new year and Farsi as their official language (news from Shahrvand newspaper, January 25th 1992, Toronto).

Throughout history, whether in times of power and domination or in times of being under attack, Iranians have kept their culture and traditions, and never forgot one thing: that they were Iranians.

1400 years ago, the Arabs brought Islam to Iran, the majority of Iranians accepted to be Muslim, but some preferred to say with their old religion which is Zartoshtian (Zoroastrians), who believed in “good thought, good word and good act”. Their prophet Zartosht (Zoroaster), was born in 700 B.C. Over the centuries Muslims and Zardoshtians lived in Iran along with people from other religions such as Jews, Christians, and recently Bahaiians.

A few weeks before Spring, all Iranians start preparing for Eid No-Rooz, by cleaning up every single spot of their homes, they call it Khaneh-Tekani, in Farsi ‘khaneh’ means home, and ‘tekani’ is shaking; they clean up their places like they have shaken it up. Of course they do not forget to buy new clothes, especially for the kids!

But the New Year is not just buying new clothes, eating good food and having fun. Philosophically, when they clean up their homes, they also get rid of all the hatred in their hearts, it is a time to try once again, to forget about everything that upset you and aim at a better relationship.

On the night before the last Wednesday of the year they have a feast of fire, they call it Chaharshanbeh Soori, meaning the “festival of Wednesday”; After it gets dark they brighten up bushes in the streets or in their back yards and everybody jumps over it.

The old Iranians loved and respected the fire and always kept it on in their temples, because they believed it was the symbol of brightness and many things could be made by fire.

For the first day of Spring, they set a traditional table which is called Haft Seen, ‘haft’ means seven and ‘seen’ is the letter s. They put seven items that in Farsi start with ‘s’, on the table. These items are: Seer (garlic), Serkeh (vinegar), Sonbol (hyacinth), Sumac, Sabzeh (green-they wet wheat or lentil for a week or two before the new year to germinate), Senjed (fruit of a kind of tree which resembles the mountain-ash), Samanou (a dish with the juice of germinating wheat or malt mixed with flour).

Other things are also put on the table, such as: bread, different kinds of sweets, boiled coloured eggs, candles, coins, apples, gold fish and a holy book.

The traditional food for New Year’s Eve is mixed vegetables with rice and white fish.

During the 12 days of feasting, everybody visits their relatives, friends, neighbours and other acquaintances. The elders are the most important, and so they are visited first, and of course the children receive their New Year gift, which is traditionally brand new crisp money.

On the thirteenth day, the last day of Eid No-Rooz, nobody stays at home, everyone goes for a picnic to the parks or out of town wherever it is green, to have fun and play tricks on each other – somewhat similar to April 1st of North America.

Those who are in love and hope to get married soon, would tie two pieces of grass together, and this is their secret for the year!

Photo Captions:
1- “Haft Seen” Traditional table of ‘Eid No-Rooz’
2- “Haji Fearooz” brings happiness and laughter to the kids, seen here at the Eid No-Rooz celebration of March 7,1992 at King Edward School (709 King Street West in Kitchener) where Iranian Heritage Language is taught on Saturday mornings, and is attended by 42 students from Iran and Afghanistan and 3 non-Farsi speaking adults

My Old Order Mennonite Heritage

The Booklet My Old Order Mennonite Heritage appeared in a sequel in Cross Cultures printed magazine ; by kind permission from the author/publisher, Mary Ann Horst. The National Film Board of Canada has chosen it as their source of information for a film strip depicting Old Order Mennonite Life in Waterloo County. In addition to writing this booklet, which has been a local best seller and has been translated into German, Mary Ann Horst has authored Pennsylvania Dutch Fun, Folklore and Cooking. She also wrote the script for the Child’s colouring book, Amsey and Sarah of Waterloo County.   A long time vendor of Kitchener Farmers’ Market, Mary Ann, in collaboration with photographer James Hertel, published the book: Our Wonderful Kitchener Farmers’ Market. Twenty-two years, and ten printings later, Mary Ann feels it is time to make a few additions to her booklet.  She will endeavour to give some information on some of the changes that have taken place in the last few decades, as well as on the exodus of some of the Waterloo County Mennonites to the Mount Forest area in latest publication, which is a sequel to ‘My Old Order Mennonite Heritage’, is entitled Old Order to Modern Mennonite.

April / May 1992

Introduction:

Frequently in my daily contacts with people, I am asked questions concerning the Old Order Mennonites. It is my hope that this booklet will provide answers to many of the questions which people are asking concerning this denomination of my forebears.

Old Order Mennonite Worship

I grew up in an Old Order Mennonite home where cars and radios and cosmetics were not permitted. As a child I wore the traditional plain button down the back dress and pinafore apron coming well below my knees.

While I have ceased to practise many of the customs and traditions of my Old Order Mennonite forebears, I have never forgotten that my early life had its roots in this cultural setting and I have in my heart a very warm spot for these people.

Sometimes in my conversations with people I am asked the question, “Why did you leave the Old Order church?”

Usually I reply something like this, “Because I wanted more freedom than they allow their members to have”

However, when I give this reply I always feel it is only a partial answer. To give a more complete answer would require the telling of a good part of my life story. For any who may be interested the following pages will provide an opportunity of a glimpse, not only into my own life, but into the general everyday life of the Old Order Mennonite people.

The Old Order Mennonites are among the most conservative of the Mennonite groups. Most of them are farmers, and have no cars and travel by horse and buggy. Their well kept farm homes are a tribute to their  agricultural prowess.

Their church buildings, which they refer to as meeting houses, are of white painted clapboard with no ornamental accessories. Inside the church the walls are white washed, and the only furnishings are plain benches of unvarnished pine wood.

The meeting house which I most frequently attended as a child is a mile outside of the little Ontario village of Floradale. Memories of those two hour Sunday morning services are printed indelibly on my mind.

Behind the long unvarnished pine pulpit sit five or six solemn faced men. These are all ministers or deacons with perhaps one bishop. Like their fellow members the Old Order Mennonite ministers usually are farmers and receive no remuneration for their preaching. They also have no specialized training to equip them for the ministry.

The men are all clean shaven and the older men wear their hair a little longer than most of general society. The young men usually have conventional haircuts but do not follow modern fads in hair styles.

The older men usually wear a suit of dark grey. The coat which has no collar is buttoned up to the neckband and has a few slits up the center back. The young men wear dark colored suits with lapelled collars, navy blue being the most common. The coat may or may not have slits up the center back.

Women sit on one side of the church and men on the other side, with each sex sitting with their approximate age group. The ladies remove their fringed black shawls and coats and hang them in the lobby before entering the main body of the church. On their heads they wear the traditional white prayer cap which is tied under the chin. Their dresses, which are usually of a dark solid color or a small check or floral design, have long full skirts. They wear a cape and apron of the same material.

There is no lobby for the men and they hang their broad-brimmed black hats on the pegs of the wooden bars which hang from the ceiling above the benches.

At their worship services the ordained clergy always greet one another with a kiss. This kiss is not only an expression of brotherly love; it is also practised as an act of obedience to the command given to the early church by the apostle Paul to, “greet one another with a holy kiss”.

The office of minister is considered one of grave responsibility. While the Old Order Mennonites are generally not averse to laughter and practical jokes, the Old Order Mennonite minister never makes an attempt at humor in his sermons. I cannot recall ever having seen even the trace of a smile on the faces of any of the ministers when they were behind the pulpit.

When a new minister is needed any man in the congregation may suggest the names of any men in the brotherhood they feel would be qualified for ministerial duties. A number of Bibles equal to the number of men whose names have been suggested are placed before the men. One of the Bibles contains a slip of paper. Each man draws a Bible and the one drawing the Bible containing the slip of paper becomes the new minister.

Sermons are given in Pennsylvania Dutch, an unwritten German dialect with a mixture of English. The Old Order Mennonite minister uses no notes; The typical minister does not raise his voice a great deal but quietly admonishes the attentive congregation in solemn serious tones.

Recently I attended a Sunday morning worship service at the Old Order Mennonite meeting house on the outskirts of the town of Elmira. This was the first time in more than twenty years. Nothing had changed!

Everything – the church and its furnishings, the order of the service, the people in their traditional attire, the sweet innocence of quaintly garbed toddlers and babes in arms – all were as they had been back in my childhood days.

With the service ended, the ladies went to the lobby where they put on their bonnets and black fringed shawls. Ladies and children waited on the side of the women’s entrance while the men went for the horses. One after another the buggies pulled up alongside of the meeting house. Each driver brought his horse to a halt and waited for the passengers within his family. Those who had a number of children in the family drove a two seated carriage drawn by two horses. One by one the beautiful prancing horses left the church yard. As they drew the buggies carrying the traditionally simply attired Mennonites they made a quaintly charming procession.

Baptismal services are conducted once a year before which candidates attend instruction classes for six successive Sunday afternoons. Usually they are between the ages of seventeen to nineteen.

I recall that as a child the grave solemnity with which these baptismal services were conducted always made a deep impression on me. To my youthful mind there was something appealingly dramatic about these youths making the solemn commitment to be true to their vows until death, regardless of what the cost might be.

Communion services are held twice a year. As in most churches they partake of the bread and wine, using actual wine. They believe the communion service has symbolical meaning only and attach no saving merit to its practice.

Following the partaking of the bread and wine they participate in what they call a foot washing ceremony. Towels and basins are provided and all baptized members participate, washing each others feet. They regard the ceremony as a symbol of brotherly love and humility and a willingness to perform even the lowliest tasks one for another.

The Old Order Mennonites have strong convictions that they are to provide for any needs within the brotherhood and for this reason they accept no governmental family allowance or old age pension cheques.

They have their own form of hospitalization towards which all members pay. Contributions are looked after in such a way that no one knows the amount which another gives.

They carry no insurance policies. If a member loses a barn through a fire, the other members contribute financially and many of them give a day’s work to help to rebuild the barn or house as the case may be.

Smoking, while not condoned, is not taboo for the men of the church. The clergy generally do not smoke and for a woman to smoke would be considered unladylike if not disgraceful.

The occasional glass of liquor is permissible, but in actuality the Old Order Mennonites consume very little alcoholic beverages. Drunkenness is considered a sin and if persisted in will bring excommunication, as will dishonesty in business or any other deviation from their puritanical moral standards.

Instances where measures such as excommunication are considered necessary are extremely rare. When it does occur the erring member is, after a time, taken back into the fellowship, providing he is willing to make public confession before the church and to promise he will make an honest effort to avoid the same error in the future.

While the laity of the church are allowed to have electricity, many of them prefer to get along without it. Electricity is not permitted for the clergy. Telephones are not allowed in the home, but if a member is in business he is permitted to have the phone in his business place. Farmers are allowed to have tractors.

Most musical instruments are prohibited, although some of the young people own harmonicas. Snapshots are forbidden.

Formal education ceases at fourteen at which time both boys and girls stay home on the farm.

In contrast with the Old Order Mennonites, there are numerous Mennonite denominations whose members visit the beauty parlors and follow current fashion trends in attire. Many of the members of these more modern groups enter professions such as teaching, social work and medicine. In between the polarities of the most conservative and the most progressive, there are varying degrees of practice. In actuality, only a small percentage of the total number of Mennonites wear the traditional attire and a still smaller number travel by horse and buggy.

Within the various Mennonite sects of Ontario, there are a total of about 19,000 baptized members. All of these trace their origin to the Anabaptist movement of the sixteenth century. The anabaptist movement originated in Switzerland and quickly spread to Holland and Germany. They were given the name Anabaptist because of their conviction that infant baptism was not scriptural. They believed that scriptural baptism was an outward symbol of inner faith and they rebaptized any adults who wished to become part of their group.

They believed that the Christian could under no circumstances participate in war. Neither did they believe a Christian should participate in civil government. They insisted that the true church consisted of believers who voluntarily choose to separate themselves from the world and that separation of church and state would be a natural consequence.

One of the early organizers of the Anabaptist movement was Menno Simons. Menno Simons was a former Roman Catholic priest, and it was from his name that the name Mennonite was derived.

The early Anabaptists’ disagreement with the Roman Catholic and the Protestant churches of that day brought them unpopularity and severe persecution. Cruel tortures were employed in the attempt to cause them to give up their faith. Felix Manz, one of the early Swiss leaders, was drowned, becoming one of the first of many who chose to die rather than to renounce his faith. Many Anabaptists were imprisoned and many were burned at the stake.

In the seventeenth century, the Quaker, William Penn, gave an invitation to any of the Anabaptists who so wished to come to America. In payment of a debt owed to his father, Penn obtained a charter to Pennsylvania from the British king. Britain promised that in America the Anabaptists would be given exemption from military service and freedom to worship as they wished. The result of the offer was that many Dutch and Swiss Mennonites came to America and settled in Pennsylvania in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

After the American revolution some of the Pennsylvania Mennonites travelled the long journey from Pennsylvania to Ontario in horse drawn conestoga wagons. Some of them stayed near the Canadian border but most of them came to what is now known as Waterloo County. They were the first white settlers in this part of the province.

Among the early settlers from Pennsylvania was a young man by the name of Abraham Weber. This Abraham Weber was my great great grandfather on my father’s side of the family. History records that young Abraham, after making the long journey from Pennsylvania to Waterloo County, camped back of what is now the Goodrich Tire Plant in Kitchener. He was soon on friendly terms with the ‘Indians’, and they spent time around his camp-fire.

At this same spot Abraham cleared the land and built a log house. Several years after building his house he married a young lady by the name of Elizabeth Cressman.

The particular wagon in which young Abraham made the trek from Pennsylvania to Waterloo County is on display in the museum of Kitchener’s Doon Pioneer Village. Every time I visit the village I stop and look at this wagon.

Always I feel within me an admiration for those men and women who chose to travel the long and oft times wearisome journey to come to Waterloo County and there carve out a new life in what was then forest wilderness.

Like their Mennonite brethren in Pennsylvania, the Mennonites in Ontario excelled in farming. As in Pennsylvania, so in Ontario, the fields flourished under their care, and to-day their well kept farm homes are a pleasant picture of peaceful rural tranquility.

Sunday Visiting & Recreation

The Old Order Mennonite custom of Sunday visiting provides welcome occasions for friendly fellowship with relatives and acquaintances. The Old Order people do not necessarily wait for an invitation but will go to any friend’s or relative’s house for Sunday dinner or supper any time they may wish to do so.

The Mennonite housewife is never certain just how many people she will have seated at her table for Sunday dinner, but she is always prepared for the possibility of company and each guest is greeted with a genuinely warm welcome.

A typical Sunday dinner consists of meat and potatoes, possibly a cabbage or bean salad, some kind of pickle and a vegetable. For dessert there will be some home preserved fruit, usually two kinds, such as strawberries and peaches, followed by cookies and cake. Nearly always the meal is ended with pie.

Before they begin to eat all bow their heads for a moment of silent, never audible grace. Food is placed in bowls on the table and each person helps himself to the various dishes as they are passed around. Sunday dinners provide an opportunity not only to, in their own words, “eat themselves full” but also for friendly informal visiting in the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect, with the well laden kitchen table providing a deliciously pleasant setting.

After the meal is finished and dishes washed and put away, the afternoon is spent in sitting and visiting. Sometimes the men will gather together in the living room and the ladies will visit with their sex in the roomy kitchen. At other times both sexes will assemble together to chat in the kitchen or living room.

Most Old Order Mennonite homes have no chesterfield suites. In the living room there are usually a number of hard, straight backed chairs and perhaps one or two old fashioned rockers and arm chairs which have been cushioned and back padded to make them more comfortable.

Frequently a rocker or an armchair are a permanent part of the kitchen furniture. Most kitchens have a couch at one end.  Windows usually have only blinds and no curtains, and very often the sills are adorned with a colourful profusion of growing plants.

While the Old Order Mennonites have very few possessions which are strictly for ornamental purposes, many of them take pride in beautiful flowers and plants, indoors and in outdoor flower beds.

Creating gaily colourful quilts and mats are pleasant activities for the ladies. Very often the female Sunday afternoon visitors are taken upstairs to see the quilts and mats which are the products of many hours of labour.

Because the Old Order Mennonite people know just about everybody within their denomination, it is natural that on a Sunday afternoon visit, conversation centres around such matters as the Martin’s new baby girl, Nancy Gingrich’s rheumatism condition … And, being human, they are not averse to a little gossip, such as: Matilda Bauman is something of a gadabout and goes to town two or three times every week, even though she has plenty of work at home and her mending basket is always overflowing, and she extravagantly buys those boxed cake mixes instead of thriftily mixing her own from scratch.. (these are typical Mennonite Christian and surnames but do not refer to any particular individuals).

I recall that as a child I, like most children, always welcomed the opportunity to go visiting with my parents. I remember one particular Sunday when it was my pleasure to travel, seated between my mother and father in the one seated horse and buggy, the eight miles to the North Woolwich Meeting House. After the church service we went to Elias Gingrichs for Sunday dinner. The Gingrichs had a daughter, Veronica, who was about my age.

That Sunday afternoon Veronica and I had a pleasant time in Veronica’s back yard playing with Veronica’s family of dolls.  “Let’s pretend,” Veronica said to me as she gently cradled a home made rag doll, “that we are stylish people with collars and belts and buckles on our dresses”.

I am quite sure that to this day Veronica has never owned a dress with a collar or a belt or buckle. She is married to an Old Order farmer and I am quite sure she is perfectly content with the simple traditional Mennonite attire minus the superfluous trims as belts and buckles.

While most of Ontario’s Old Order Mennonites do very little travelling outside of their own community, many of them at least once in a life time pay a visit to the Old Order Mennonite community in Pennsylvania. My father and Angus Bowman, another Old Order youth, took this journey by train with the practised custom, they were warmly received by their Pennsylvania brethren, who gladly took time out of their busy work day schedules to escort them by horse and buggy to visit many of the Old Order homes.

My father never tired of fondly reminiscing about those six weeks. When his friend, Angus Bowman, who later became a deacon in the church, would visit our home, the conversation would frequently turn to this happy highlight of their youth.

During the week the Old Order Mennonite people take very little time off for recreation. Usually they rise between five and six in the morning and work till eight or nine in the evening. However, the Old Order Mennonite farmer frequently manages to combine business with pleasure. When he has business in town he will very often meet one of his Mennonite farmer friends and is likely to take time to chat awhile on any news of current interest. Going to Kitchener or Waterloo stockyards, where he may buy and sell livestock, may also be a time for an occasion to visit with his Pennsylvania Dutch farm friends.

For the ladies, quilting bees are not only occasions to produce gaily attractive bed covers;  they are also a welcome opportunity for friendly informal visiting.  My mother, who at the time of this writing is eighty-two years old, is at her happiest when she can join a group of Pennsylvania Dutch ladies around a quilt in her own parlor or in that of one of her friends.  For these practical minded Mennonite ladies, quiltings are a counterpart of what afternoon bridge is to others.

Some of the quilts will be put to practical use as a bed cover soon after completion.  Others may be put in the hope chest of a hopeful teen age daughter.  Still others are made for the purpose of being given to those who lack an adequate supply of material goods.  This may be someone within their own community or it may be someone overseas.

Frequently I hear people say that quilting is a craft which seems to be gradually dying out.  Not so with the Old Order Mennonites.  With the younger as well as with the older ladies, quilting bees are still a treasured practical and sociable hobby.

Childhood Joys and Trails

Like most children of Old Order Mennonite parentage the first years of my life were spent on a farm home.  However, when I was almost five years old, my parents left the farm and moved to the little village of Floradale.  For me those years in the little village were happy years.

Most every day I played with my little next door friend, Elmeta, either at her house or mine.  Elmeta’s parents belonged to the more modern Ontario Conference Mennonite church and Elmeta’s dresses were considerably more stylish than mine.  Sometimes I was just a bit envious of her more gaily coloured frocks with collars and belts and buckles.  To me a dress with a collar and a belt and a buckle was  a dress of pretty high style.

The Old Order Mennonite and the Ontario Conference Mennonite churches had been one denomination until the year 1889.  The group which became known as the Ontario Conference Mennonite denomination wished to have evening services and Sunday Schools.  While they upheld the desirability of simplicity in dress and some adherence to specific, traditional Mennonite attire, they were more liberal in their regulations concerning dress.

Their differing viewpoints led to a denominational split.  Since then there have been numerous similar divisions, a result of these being the number of different Mennonite denominations of to-day.

Despite the difference in our apparel, Elmeta and I played happily together, mothering our dolls, keeping house in Elmeta’s play house and exploring the surrounding country-side.

When we were almost six, Elmeta and I began our years of formal education in the two room village school about a quarter of a mile outside of the village.  Some time before we began attending school, my big sister Sarah taught us to read a bit and coached us on our arithmetic until we could count to one hundred.  I recall that on that first day of school were were the only two children in the beginners’ class who could count all the way to one hundred.  Despite my plainly orthodox Mennonite apparel, this accomplishment gave me a pleasant feeling of unholy pride.  Of course, I realize now that this was not due to superior intelligence on our part, but to the hours of coaching Sarah had given us.

Most of the residents of Floradale spoke the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect.  Since most Old Order Mennonites lived on farms, there were not many Old Order people living right in the village.  However, I had quite a number of Old Order Mennonite school mates from the surrounding rural homes.  A number of village residents were Ontario Conference Mennonites and there were also quite a number of Lutherans and Evangelical United Brethren.  The latter have since amalgamated with the United Church of Canada.

Floradale was a friendly little village, where every one not only knew everyone else, but also knew such interesting details such as which housewife was a model housekeeper and which one didn’t much care  whether the mending and the dusting were ever caught up or not.  Also everyone had a pretty good idea which of the married couples  got along reasonable well and which ones frequently fought like cats and dogs.

Little errands like going to the village store to pick up the occasional loaf of bread for my mother and going to the post office to see if there was any mail, were pleasant  incidents of life in a small village where the grocery and the postal clerks were familiar friends.

Some Sundays I went with my parents to worship services at the North Woolwich Old Order Mennonite Meeting House about a mile outside of the village.  Since the Old Order Mennonites held services in one particular meeting house only on alternate Sundays, attendance at worship service is not always an every Sunday occasion.

When I was almost eight my father made a decision that was going to mean quite a change for his family and would bring to an end our life in the little village. The decision he made somewhat alarmed many of his Old Order Mennonite relatives and friends.

He decided that he would buy a farm eight miles north of Floradale in a non-Mennonite English speaking community near the village of Alma. Eight miles by horse and buggy was considered quite a long journey and didn’t my father realize, some of his Old Order Mennonite acquaintances wondered, that the influence of the non-Mennonite English speaking community might cause his children to leave the customs and traditions of Old Order Mennonite life? But my father wanted a farm. He had suffered some ill luck and financial loss during the depression of the thirties and the land up Alma way was productive and it was cheap. Despite the well meaning warnings, my father took us to his farm in this English speaking community. To many of his Old Order friends I am sure it seemed as though he was taking us to the other end of the world.

I felt a little timid the first morning my father drove my brother Eli and me via horse and buggy to the little red one room school house. I remember feeling a little self-conscious, aware that I was the only little girl wearing a dress that came well below my knees with a matching pinafore apron. However, the new teacher and the little United and Presbyterian children, who were mostly of Scottish and Irish descent, were kind and friendly and I was soon happy in my new setting; though for the first few months that we lived on the farm I sometimes grew rather lonely for my former village friends. Here there was no next door Elmeta; and our closest neighbours were older people with no young children. Farm life, however, had its advantages. Playing hide and seek in the barn with my brothers Noah and Eli and jumping in the straw and hay were lots of fun. And one day, for fifty cents, Eli bought a wee brown and white floppy eared collie puppy. We loved him dearly and though he was a male pup we decided to name him Trixie.

Despite their sombre dress and the fact that they frequently appear somewhat shy when in public, the Old Order Mennonite children love fun and gaiety as much as their more fancily attired contemporaries. My brother Eli and I were no exception to this. Our childhood experience which I fondly and amusedly remember took place when I was about ten and Eli was about twelve.

One bright warm Saturday May morning Eli and I decided we would like to go fishing. We got my father’s permission to travel by horse and buggy to the picturesque winding creek three miles up the road. Eli hitched the horse to the buggy and we felt quite proud and grown-up as we drive off. When we reached our destination we discovered a delightful surprise. Trixie had travelled along with us! Unknown to us he had trotted along all the way keeping himself hidden under the buggy. (It was one of the sore trials of Trixie’s life that he could not usually accompany us when we left home, but this time he had outsmarted us all !) We were delighted to have his company and we patted him, fussed over him, and told him what a nice dog he was. The three of us had a most enjoyable morning. We felt very proud to have such a smart, if not thoroughly obedient, dog.

There was only one thing that bothered me about Trixie. It seemed that most grown-ups assumed without question that no dogs would ever go to heaven. I never discussed the matter with any adults, but at times I hopefully wondered whether they might not be wrong.

Besides Trixie we usually had four or five cats and every now and then one would produce a litter of kittens. Eli and I were always delighted when it became apparent that one of the female cats was in the family way. After the kittens were born we always enjoyed watching the rather ugly little furry creatures gradually develop into adorable playful bundles of fluff.

Whenever there was a new baby calf the happy task of feeding the new addition always fell to us.

My parents never told us a word about the facts of life, but we were not as completely uneducated in this area as might have been expected. I suspect this applies to most Old Order Mennonite farm children. Birth, whether it was the arrival of a new kitten or a new baby brother, is joyfully accepted as a natural and happy event.

Quite frequently in my conversations with people I have heard the remark, “Mennonite children always seem to be so good“.

While I would not argue with the fact that severe disciplinary problems are quite rare (but hardly nonexistent) I am also aware that Mennonite children, like any other children, are not always perfectly well behaved. While they may often appear to be quite timid when out in public, that shy little brown eyed boy and demure bonneted lass may well be capable of being just as impishly mischievous as their Irish O’Shannigan or Mulrooney contemporaries.

It is also a fact that Mennonite boys, like any other boys, love to tease their sisters, especially if they can get a pleasingly temperamental response. My big brother Urias was no exception to this. I remember that on one occasion when he pestered me unmercifully, I became so angry I picked up a block of wood and threw it at him. Perhaps my aim was poor or perhaps he ducked very quickly; anyway, the block of wood missed hitting him. To add to my frustration my mother gave me the hardest spanking I have ever had in my entire life. To make a bad matter even worse, Eli, who really was my dear friend and who I usually loved most devotedly, thought the whole matter hilariously funny. He laughed and laughed until I wanted to throw something at him, too – of course, I didn’t dare.

The Mennonite farm child usually has fewer toys than most of his city contemporaries. A little girl will probably have a few rag dolls and perhaps a low priced store bought doll. A little boy may have a tractor and a few trucks. Both boys and girls may have a few stuffed animals, usually home made.

Though the Mennonite child learns the discipline of hard work at a tender age, laughter and play are also a part of every day life, and he has a balanced routine of toil and fun.

Adolescence and Early Youth

When the Old Order Mennonite girl reaches fourteen or so she replaces her little girl pinafore with a cape and apron. Her skirts become longer and she begins to wear her hair in a bun.

When my sister, Susannah, first switched to adult clothes, her new black satin bonnet was topped with a black bow of identical material. The most conservative of the Old Order do not have this bow. One of my mother’s good hearted but out-spoken and ultra-conservative friends expressed disapproval of this vain frivolity.

“When my Selina gets long dresses,” she told my mother, “she won’t get one of those bows on top of her bonnet”.

Even amongst the Old Order there are degrees of conservatism in dress and adherence to the keeping of the old traditions. With my parents my father was the more conservative of the two. My mother, though she loved the church and her fellow members and was loyal to all the church rules and traditions, was less rigid in her opinion as to what was permissible than was my father. One reason for this difference may have been the fact that my mother’s mother had been Methodist and had turned Mennonite when she married my grandfather. Some influence from this denominational background may have filtered through to my mother.

My father’s parents had been very conservative and had considered the adherence to the old traditions and customs a solemn obligation.

I can still hear my father stating that his mother had frequently admonished her children to follow the example of those who were the most conservative in dress.

Most of the Old Order Mennonite people would find it hard to give a logical theological explanation for many of their customs. They would say that refraining from having cars and telephones and wearing of the traditional dress help them to retain their distinction from the world and to preserve their way of life.

For the Old Order Mennonite girl the teen years are usually happy and somewhat exciting years. She works on her parent’s farm, or, if not need by them will probably be hired out to another Old Order Mennonite farm couple. Though her every day routine might sound like a life of hard work and drudgery, the typical Old Order Mennonite girl is generally quite happy.

On a typical day she will arise around six and then go out to the cow stable to help with the milking. The rest of the day she is busy with such chores as washing, ironing, cleaning, cooking and mending. Some days she may go to the field and hoe turnips or thin out young mangels. All this for room and board and pay which most of to-day’s employees would call peanuts !

The young man’s routine is similar except that his work keeps him busy in the barn and fields.

Nevertheless, life is not all work. On Sunday mornings there is worship service to attend. Sunday afternoons are frequently spent in visiting and entertaining friends while Sunday evenings for the young people are wonderful fun.

Each Sunday evening the young people have a get together in one of the Mennonite homes. If a young mane escorts a young lady to one of these get togethers, it is assumed that the two young people are going together. It is not the custom of the Old Order Mennonite youth to date more than one young lady simultaneously. If per chance the young man’s fancy is attracted by the charms of another lass, he will first terminate his relationship with his previous partner before beginning to date his new interest. Both the young man and the young lady are free to terminate their courtship whenever they wish.

At these Sunday evening get togethers the young people sit about and chat. They sing hymns, usually in English, and faster than their slow Sunday morning worship service tempo. They play ring games, which are a sort of drill game somewhat similar to square dancing. Sometimes someone will entertain the group by playing a harmonica.

Occasionally some of them engage in a bit of square dancing though Sunday evening square dancing does not have the full approval of all the older members. However, many of the older people are inclined to shrug off any criticism of this form of entertainment with an indulgent, “Ach, the young people must have a little bit of fun”.

In the meantime square dancing has never been strictly forbidden and the more dashing Old Order Mennonite youth happily continues to swing his partner and to tap his feet to the lively old barn dance reels.

My friend, Melinda Martin, was a typically happy Old Order Mennonite teen age young lady only a few months my senior. One Sunday afternoon, shortly after her fourteenth birthday, Melinda paid me a visit.

“I love going to church,” Melinda told me enthusiastically, during our afternoon visit. “And I think Sunday evenings are so much fun. I really love to dance”.

Melinda didn’t attend the young peoples’ get togethers very long until one young man began escorting her regularly via buggy and beautiful prancing horse.

Unlike my friend Melinda, I cannot say that I found the prospect of settling down to the everyday life of the Old Order Mennonite girl completely appealing in every way. Perhaps some of the well meaning advice of my father’s Old Order friends and relatives had not been without sound reasoning.

“Aren’t you afraid”, they had said, “that if you take your children to an English speaking community, the influence of the non-Mennonites around them may take them away from the church?”

Also some of the influences within my own family circle were not conductive to making the Old Order Mennonite way of life appear as the only satisfying one. My two oldest brothers Ismael and David and my sister Susannah had joined the Old Order Church. Urias had joined the Waterloo County Markham Mennonite Church, which was slightly more progressive than the Old Order, in that they were allowed to have cars and were a little less rigid in their regulations concerning dress. My sister Sarah was still undecided but was considering becoming a member of the more modern Ontario Conference Mennonite denomination.

A number of years previous to this my sister Selinda had fallen in love with a neighbouring young Presbyterian farm lad. My parents had expressed disapproval when the young man began dating my sister. Because of my parents’ disapproval the young couple stopped seeing one another for some time, but later again resumed their courtship. When they finally married, however, my parents appeared to be quite resigned to the situation. The marriage was a happy but heart-breakingly short one, as about a year and a half after the wedding day Selinda died of complications in childbirth.

In far off Europe World War II was raging. My brother Noah on reaching eighteen had enlisted in the army to my parents’ deep disappointment. While the general public bestowed the highest praise on the young service men of the armed forces, the sight of handsome young Noah in khaki uniform made my mother and father want to weep.

It was probably small wonder that I was not ready to unquestioningly accept the Old Order Mennonite way of life as I was aware that my parents hoped I would. Also at this time I was feeling somewhat sad because I could not go on to high school as my three other class mates from the little red school house had done. I still had not lost my hankering for dresses with collars and belts and buckles.

About this time my mother took me to the store in the village of St.Jacobs and bought me a new black coat, topped with a black Persian Lamb collar. To my father this fur collar was unnecessary worldly adornment. It was with a stern frown that he expressed his disapproval. My mother, always ready to make every effort to keep everyone happy, began to take the collar off, performing this task when I wasn’t around. When she had the collar almost off I came on the scene and I raised quite a fuss.

“The coat will look ridiculous without the collar!” I grumbled in peeved annoyance “And what is wrong with a little collar like that anyway?”

My poor darling mother! She quietly and patiently stitched the collar back on.

The winter when I was a very youthful fourteen and a half I left home to go out working. Unlike my Old Order contemporaries, I did not find employment with an Old Order Mennonite farmer. Instead I went to work and live in the City of Kitchener.

My sister Sarah had been working in the housekeeping department of Kitchener-Waterloo Hospital for about a year. At this time help was scarce and I think the housekeeping supervisor had discovered that Mennonite young ladies were generally reliable and not too much afraid of hard work. So, despite my youthful years, I was hired to join the housekeeping staff of Kitchener-Waterloo Hospital, (then a much smaller institution than now).

Had it not been for the fact that Sarah was already working there I do not think my mother would have allowed me to go to the big city. As it was, it was only after considerable coaxing on my part that she somewhat reluctantly gave her consent. I think that she half suspected that I would leave the Old Order Mennonite way of life and at the same time I think she realized that it was necessary for me to have the freedom to live my own life.

From that time on my association with my Old Order Mennonite friends became less and less. I began attending worship services at the Erb Street Mennonite Church in Waterloo, one of the Ontario Conference Mennonite churches.

Visits to my home for weekends, holidays, and sometimes for periods of several months during the summer, were always times of happy reunions. Nevertheless, the fact that I was gradually abandoning the traditional Old Order attire did cause some uncomfortable moments.

To my father this adoption of a more modern form of attire than the traditional Old Order Mennonite garb was an indication of an inordinate love for the world. Very frequently he would express his disapproval with two German scriptural quotations: “Habt nicht lieb die Welt,” he would admonish us solemnly; and “Stellet euch nicht dieser Welt Gleich”.

Whenever my mother expressed disapproval of a too bright colour or too short skirt (which really was not very frequent) it was in less theological terms.

“Ach,” she would say apprehensively, “what will our relatives think?”

When I was seventeen I was received by baptism into what was then known as the Ontario Conference Mennonite Church, which in 1987 adopted the name Mennonite Conference of Eastern Canada.

The day when I took my baptismal vows stands out vividly in my memory. I remember that it was with a humble awareness of my own shortcomings that I made the vow to be true to Jesus Christ until death. This vow of loyalty till death is made in both the Old Order and the Mennonite Conference of Eastern Canada churches at the time of baptism.

This conference to-day has no regulations concerning dress, although they encourage simple and modest style in clothing. They accept higher education and like nearly all Mennonites are pacifists, placing a strong emphasis on the Christian’s obligation towards his fellow men. They send relief and mission workers to many parts of the world.

I recall that around the time I was baptized I had some feelings of sadness, because I knew that my decision to affiliate with a more modern Mennonite church was a disappointment to my parents, especially my father. However, it was probably easier for me than my older brothers and sisters who had left the Old Order Mennonite denomination. By this time it seemed that my parents had grown somewhat resigned to their children’s departure from the old ways.

Reminiscence

Over twenty years have passed since the day that I made my baptismal vows. Since then my attendance at Old Order Mennonite church services have been limited almost exclusively to the funerals of my aunts and uncles. During those years all of my mother’s brothers and sisters have passed away.

My father’s two sisters and his one brother also passed away during these years. And four years ago we laid our father to rest in the burial plot beside Martin’s Meeting House. In this same cemetery are buried both my grandparents on my mother’s and on my father’s side.

Some people on attending Old Order Mennonite funeral services for the first time are somewhat taken aback. There are no flowers at Old Order Mennonite funeral services, while the deceased is clothed in a white shroud and has not a touch of cosmetics. The black coffin lined with white material is very plain and simple.

Prior to the final church gathering a service is held at the home of the deceased. Only relatives and very close friends attend this house service. After this service in the house, and before the final one in the church, the body is taken by a horse drawn carriage to the church cemetery where a grave side burial service is conducted. With the family standing about the coffin a fitting hymn is sung and prayer is offered. The casket is lowered and a few shovels of sod are dropped on the closed lid of the lowered casket. After the grave side service the final service is conducted in the meeting house.

To some people the Old Order Mennonite funeral services may seem unnecessarily austere, yet from my own observations, it seems to me, that the Old Order Mennonites are often able to accept death with greater serenity than is true for much of general society about them.

At all times, and especially at the time of funerals, there is in the Old Order Mennonite denomination a strong emphasis on the on-going life after death. It seems that this emphasis enables them to accept death as a natural, even welcome, sequel of life.

To me my own father’s funeral was not an entirely sad occasion. In his sermon the minister mentioned the fact that he had frequently visited my father during my father’s final illness, and that on these visits he had sensed that my father was anticipating the life of the eternal hereafter. As I took a last look at my father’s face I felt a sense of sadness, but greater than the sense of sadness, I also felt within me a surge of joyful triumph. With my Old Order friends I could rejoice in the comforting solace that Father had entered into the bliss of the eternal.

I didn’t mind one bit that there was not one flower beside his unadorned black coffin. Everything was plain and simple and in harmony with the old ways and traditions he had known and loved while he lived. To me it all seemed perfectly right and good.

Following the final service, it is the custom for relatives and friends to go to the house of the deceased. A substantial meal is served and a time of visiting follows. This period of visiting and fellowship helps to alleviate, for the family of the deceased, some of the inevitable strain of the preceding days.

* * * * * * *

In the meanwhile, while progress and constant change are the order of the day, the quiet, God-fearing Old Order Mennonites are continuing to follow the customs and traditions of their fathers and their father’s fathers before them. Among these plainly attired, quiet living people are some of my dearest friends. Nevertheless, despite my enduring love and respect for them, I have no regrets that I did not stay within the denomination of my forebears. I would, however, be the last to encourage any other young person of an Old Order Mennonite background to make the same decision without first doing some long and careful thinking. I might warn him that for one who has spent his early years within the confines of such as the Old Order Mennonite community, life in the more complex and highly competitive modern society may be somewhat frightening and he may keenly miss the personal close-knit relationships which are still a part of Old Order Mennonite life to-day. I would remind him that along with new advantages and new freedoms there will also be new difficulties.

Despite all the pros and cons which one might mention, there are always those youths of Old Order Mennonite background, for whom the yearning for greater freedom and broader range of interests are such that they virtually must leave in order to find the highest degree of satisfaction and fulfillment in life. Now and then even these persons may sense within them a yearning nostalgia for the more serene simple life of the Old Order farm folks.

But even for the quiet living, God fearing Old Order Mennonites, life is not always perfectly serene and peaceful; like all of humanity they have their problems and difficulties. Ill health and financial reverses also come to them. There are the occasional episodes of family squabbles and in-law bickering.

While they can, on the whole, be described as a good people, they, like all the rest of humanity, have their imperfections. Within their group there sometimes is the occasional black sheep, who, through dishonesty or some other deviation from their high moral standards, brings a black mark on his reputation. The whole spectrum of human virtues and weaknesses can be found within the Old Order community as well as amongst any other group of people.

Nevertheless, for the Old Order Mennonites, life in general is usually quite peaceful. Family life is generally happy and congenial. In a world in which there is much bustling activity and high tension the Old Order Mennonites are a pleasingly restful picture of serene rural tranquility.

One of the greatest joys of my life is to occasionally take time to visit some of my Old Order Mennonite farm friends, to sit and chat with them in the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect around a delightfully well laden kitchen table. Sometimes immediately following the moment of silent grace preceding the meal they will admonish me, “Now, just help yourself and eat yourself full”.

Whether they specifically tell me to do this or not, I know that this is precisely what any one is expected to do at an Old Order Mennonite table and I happily “eat myself full”.

And whenever I have the opportunity I love to watch my Old Order Mennonite friends travel the Waterloo County roads with their buggies and beautiful prancing horses. I watch them and I say to myself, “There is something so beautiful about this. Ach yes, there is something truly beautiful about it”.

May it be a lasting beauty of Waterloo County.

…. much has changed in the world around me since I wrote the preceding chapters of this book. While modern technology has continuously been introducing new labour saving devices, supposedly making our lives simpler and easier, the pace of life for most people has continued to accelerate.

While I am well aware that not everything was better back in the “good old days”, I must admit to sometimes having the uneasy feeling of being surrounded by a world of perpetual change.

At such times it gives me a feeling of quiet reassurance to see the stalwart Old Order farm folk still carrying on the customs and traditions of their forebears. The horse drawn buggy is still their mode of transportation for trips to town to look after business matters and the purchasing of a few groceries. On Sundays one can still see a steady stream of buggies and a few dachwaegles (closed in buggies with roofs) carrying their traditionally garbed passengers to the simple meeting houses which have remained basically unchanged in architectural style for over a hundred years. After church service many of the Old Order folk will, with or without invitation, go to the farm home of relatives or friends for Sunday dinner as has been their custom for generations. Yet, even as I watch the procession of buggies, I, with a touch of sadness, concede that modern innovations have also touched their lives and that gradually changes are creeping into their lifestyle.

Probably the area in which the Old Order Mennonites have changed the most in the last two or three decades is in their farming operation. When I was a child it was customary to give the children of six or seven years the task of milking one cow, usually beginning with the bossy that let her milk down easily and wasn’t a kicker. From one cow they would gradually go on to milking two or three or more cows. To-day, instead of a herd of eight to twelve cows, many Old Order farmers have twenty to thirty cows which are milked by machine and the milk stored in large bulk coolers.

Many Old Order Mennonite farmers no longer keep the heavy work horses needed for pulling heavy loads of hay or grain and for other general farm work. The horse drawn binder and the hay loader of my father’s day have become nearly extinct – even on Old Order Mennonite farms. More and more the Old Order are investing money in more expensive and more sophisticated machinery.

Yet while there is a steady progression of modernization the church in typical Old Order Mennonite fashion is putting some restrictions on the acceptance of modern technology. The stable cleaners and silo loaders and combines that many non-Mennonite farmers have are prohibited for the Old Order Mennonite farmer. The church has also laid down some rules limiting the size of their tractors and other machinery. Hydro, as I have said in the first chapter of this book, is permitted. Yet, they still maintain the rule that the clergy have no electricity. And there are still some of the laity who, if they purchase a farm equipped with electrical power, will have it removed.

 

 

Baha’i . . . page

Baha’i Fast
Grace Guido
April / May 1992
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

There are many different calendars used throughout the world today, none corresponding completely with the other.  Baha’is living in countries scattered over the globe make use of a new calendar that was inaugurated by the Bab in 1844, the forerunner of the Baha’i Faith.  The calendar starts with New Year; it is astronomically fixed and begins with the March equinox (usually March 21), which many cultures celebrate as the first day of Spring. There are 19 months, each having nineteen days; community gatherings called Nineteen Day Feasts are held on the first day of each month. The months are named with titles such as: Splendour, Glory, Beauty, Mercy, Light, Will and Dominion.

There are nine Holy Days, on which work is suspended and commemorations or festivities take place. In addition, Baha’is celebrate a period of four days (five in Leap years), known as Ayyam-i-Ha or Intercalary Days, a period of hospitality and sharing, as preparation for the annual fast.

During the month of March each year, for a period of nineteen days, Baha’is are enjoined to observe a fast from food and drink between sunrise and sunset. The fast permits a periodic cleansing of the body which is a healthy practice providing it is not carried to excess. March is a time of year when the fast period, approximately twelve hours per day, is most equivalent all over the world. Baha’is who are sick or old, women who are pregnant or nursing, children and those who are travelling do not need to observe the fast.

Although fasting benefits the body, it is essentially intended as a spiritual discipline. Abstinence makes one appreciate the things he has all the more, and also helps one understand the condition of those who do not have basic needs. Fasting requires a change of habit and assists us to realize how much we are bound by our own ideas and customs; when we experience our capacity to break our traditional way of doing things, we learn that the changes needed in an ever-advancing society are possible. Fasting, which begins as sacrifice, becomes hope.

The Fast ends at sunset on March 20th, the beginning of a new Baha’i year. Baha’is around the world celebrate the breaking of the fast at the festival Naw Ruz or New Day.

It is especially appropriate, to Baha’is who hold that humanity is one single race, that this important Baha’i Holy Day has been designated by the United Nations as: International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

The Baha’i Calendar and the Feast
Grace Guido
June / July 1992
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The Baha’i Calendar dates from the declaration of the Bab, the Herald of the Baha’i faith, on March 22/23, in 1844, which marks the beginning of the Baha’i era. The calendar is based on the solar year, beginning on the March Equinox, and is divided into nineteen months, each of nineteen days, with four Intercalary days to make up the year, except in leap years when a fifth Intercalary day is added. Each day begins at sunset at any location on the globe. The months have spiritual attributes with names such as: Splendour, Will, Glory, Light, Mercy, Knowledge, Questions, Speech, Honour, Loftiness ..

The calendar exemplifies the Baha’i belief to “tread the spiritual path with practical feet”. Incorporated within the Baha’i ear are special dates which provide for the four aspects of humanity: the physical and emotional, the spiritual and the social being. For instance, every nineteen days, at the beginning of each Baha’i month, the community gathers to celebrate the Nineteen Day Feast. All Baha’is participate in the same three components in their feasts: spiritual, administrative or consultative, and social nurturing.

Since there is no clergy in the Baha’i faith, the host or hostess (or sometimes a committee) for each feast, chooses the readings. Individuals, young and old, may add prayers relevant to their own spiritual, physical or social concerns that may be read, recited from memory, chanted or sung in a variety of languages. They are taken from writings by the Bab, Baha’u’llah, founder of the faith, and Abdu’l-Baha, his son and sole interpreter.

The community then discusses its business and consults on matters to be presented to its Assembly – an elected Baha’i administrative body. The secretary shares correspondence. Every person is encouraged to contribute to the discussion.

The final part of the Nineteen Day Feast, is a time for informal socializing. The host/ess personally serves the friends food and drink. There is no ritual, so each host/ess may be as creative as he/she wishes. Feasts throughout the world occur on the same days but may be as varied as the cultures in which they take place – customs, music, arts, language, food, location and hospitality. Unity in diversity is emphasized.

There are nine Holy days in each year when Baha’is refrain from work. Two days commemorate the passing of the Bab and Baha’u’llah, while the other seven days are times of celebration and joy, and they are:

* New Year’s day, the first day of each Baha’i year (the feast of Naw Ruz on March 21st), marking the end of the fasting period that takes place between dawn and sundown during the last month in the Baha’i year (nineteen days between March 2 – 21) and is preceded by intercalary days on which social gatherings and visits take place

* The Period of Ridvan which includes the most important dates on the Baha’i calendar: April 21, April 29 and May 2; remembering Baha’u’llah’s Declaration of His Mission in the Garden of Ridvan (Paradise), near Baghdad, in 1863. Similarly, the Bab’s Declaration in Shiraz, Persia, 1844, is celebrated May 23rd

* The Ascension of Baha’u’llah,1892, is commemorated May 29th

* The Martyrdom of the Bab in 1850 is honoured each July 9th

* The birth of the Bab in 1819 and of Baha’u’llah in 1817 are celebrated on October 20th and November 12th respectively

The gatherings for several of these celebrations are held at times during the day that reflect the time of the actual event they commemorate.

There are two other anniversaries in the calendar which are not treated as days when work should be suspended:

The Day of the Covenant, November 26,
and …
The passing of Abdu’l-Baha, November 28th

In recent years many Baha’i communities around the globe also observe: World Religion Day, International Women’s Day, Race Unity Day, International Day of Peace, Universal Children’s Day, United Nation’s Day, and Human Rights Day; and this is because they wish to abolish prejudice and to establish oneness of humanity and world peace.

Unity in Diversity Week : Sharing a Timely Principle
October / November 1992
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Niels Hodsman is a national award winning writer-producer and freelance writer, who has done ground-breaking work in racial equity, family violence and sexual harassment projects. He holds a BA in Philosophy and a second one pending in Psychology.

Unity in Diversity Week is a Canada-wide observance, presently before Federal Parliament in a private member’s bill for official national recognition. The idea derived from the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of Canada, who felt, it seems, that there is no more timely principle than the one embodied in this well known but less understood phrase.

Unity in Diversity Week falls on the second week of November each year or in 1992, November 8-14th. Going well beyond mere tolerance of others different from ourselves, surpassing the notions of multiculturalism and a pluralistic society as such, Unity in Diversity implies, beyond the passive acceptance of the status quo, an active and conscious embracing of the oneness and wholeness of humanity.

It would be no exaggeration to say that many of today’s controversial and problematic issues, both within Canada and without, are tied directly to what both sides recognize of this principle. In the 1860’s, Baha’u’llah, founder of the Baha’i world community, was imprisoned for offering this principle of the oneness of humanity to the world. He wrote to all the great heads of state and religious leaders of His time, making clear the benefits of carrying out what He called the pivot of His Dispensation, at that time, the world-at-large could not understand and accept the relevance of this principle. Today, however, many leaders and people are becoming convinced that besides working together in some form of unity, while preserving human diversity, we have very few options.

Similarly in the 16th century, when the idea that the earth circled around the sun was introduced, society rejected it outright. However, as the idea was gradually absorbed, it dramatically changed our conception of the world we live in. The oneness of humanity is also proceeding through stages of acceptance, and when humanity rises to embrace and cherish this fundamental principle of unity in diversity, to enact it as an attitude, human relationships between people on this planet will change dramatically for the better.

When a value or way of seeing or doing things is incorporated into one’s way of life, it is said to be part of our culture. In short, culture is what we have and what we do about it. The idea that culture can take on universal values is certainly not foreign to most of us. Its adoption, far from suppressing present cultures, would add a quality of action that reflects and actualizes this universality. For example, my Danish heritage, my love of family reunions every 5 years in Denmark, of songs, traditions, of my family tree and ancestry … none of this contradicts my love for humanity, my identification with the planetary human situation. Conversely, having my own roots complements but does not contradict my loyalty to mankind. In short, there is no ‘them’ in my conception, less worth consideration than any ‘us’ in which I have roots. It is this conception of unity in diversity which will dramatically improve the human condition world wide.

Let us consider the reverse for one moment. Consider the conflicts, bloodshed, indifference to suffering, and general destruction caused by asserting privileges, rights to judge, or neglecting others for reasons of religion, race, nation, culture, sex, class, economic status, or situation. If we were to liken human differences to the various cells in a body, if for example, liver cells, muscle and hair cells attacked each other, or rejected other cells unlike themselves, we would have a sick organism. Now an auto-immune disease is defined as a condition wherein cells within a body attack other cells of its own. Thus, could we not say that the human species on this planet is suffering from an auto-immune disease, because component cell groups are ideationally, (instead of genetically) programmed to neglect or attack so called foreign cells? Could we possibly change this behaviour over time ?

There are also some who might feel the status quo is not so bad, or doesn’t have much need to improve. If you know someone like that paint these two pictures. Imagine 100 years in the future first of all. Our descendants learn that our century spent untold trillions on military arms, and squandered huge efforts for personal profit on trivial products, while allowing billions of people to go undernourished and millions to starve to death, without taking any significant steps to wipe out world hunger once and for all. They might find this to be barbaric – and when seeking a reason they will sooner or later have to accept the fact that somewhere between political leaders and the man in the street, a racial, religious, political or national ‘them’ just didn’t matter to a pre-occupied ‘us’.

The second picture reflects only the present cost of racial discrimination in Canada from a government ministry speech given in 1989 by Gerry Weiner. At that time he listed the toll this way, and this again applies only to racism.

“What does racism cost a society such as ours ? It costs us young people, who turn to the illusory opportunity of drugs and crime, because they cannot see or find other opportunities or expectations for their future.

We pay the cost in alcoholism; in lost productivity; in family violence; in the trivialization of human life, others and our own, born of the endless and ultimately overwhelming frustration of never belonging.

The cost is in increased welfare and social services; in increased health care and mental health care; on the resources that must be spent on law enforcement and incarceration, instead of on universities and libraries.

The cost is in decaying and neglected neighbourhoods; in downtown cores which lose their vitality and dynamism.

But most of all, the cost of racism is in people who no longer talk to each other, or even to begin to work on problems they share in common. It becomes the destruction of trust and respect for one another which in the final analysis, is what binds and holds together a community”

We might ask whether these costs have gone up or down in the last 3 years and several riots later. This aspect of unity in diversity refers to both sides not solely to the perpetrator or the victim.

It appears that with the growth of human interaction and technology, the arrival of a world which embraces all humanity in principle is inevitable over time. Our period was to do with bringing it about, with making it a common heritage of all cultures. It involves drawing on the good hearts of so many, the better thoughts and attitudes. It includes letting youth know about it, demonstrating it in action to those who haven’t thought about it. Unity in Diversity Week is about all these things we can do to educate and demonstrate its importance, and best of all, to have fun doing it !

What Unites and What Divides
Niels Hodsman
February / March 1993
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Unity in Diversity week has come and gone: last November 9-15th. Yet most significant is that the commitment to action went past that week in the Wellington County area – people responded not to time-based programs but to vital issues, irrespective of time.

For example, on the first day of Unity in Diversity week 350,000 German citizens took to the streets to protest race hate in their country. Finding this to be a significant event, we arranged with the German Embassy and several High Schools in the Guelph-Elora-Fergus-Arthur areas to send telegrams to Chancellor Helmut Kohl, congratulating the German people for their confrontation with racism in their country, and giving our support, towards a racism-free world.

For my part, I met with a student group called The Rainbow Coalition, who were to formulate the telegram on behalf of Centre Wellington District Secondary School. Arriving for lunch I met with five young women, all alert and full of intelligent and concerned questions. At one point I remarked to my new friends that there were no young men among them, and I told them not to be concerned by that because most all the improved social changes in this century have been initiated by women.

These same young women committed themselves to a fund-raising campaign for Somalia – later in early December. This is the kind of response we received everywhere, and it was found that when time or work constraints held back a teacher’s ability to act, that a conscientious awareness was often committed elsewhere, in their school schedules. The same willingness was found among members of the business community.

My own efforts and thoughts were rewarded by a deeper insight into the crux of this principle of unity in diversity. It is this: the essential aspects and qualities are common to all. The differences among humanity are secondary and non-essential.

More specifically, we all hurt when mistreated, enjoy friends and kind treatment, starve when not fed; we all need shelter, a social milieu, have a need and a capacity to learn, have spiritual capacities; we all suffer when physical pain or illness visits us; we all benefit from justice and fairness, etc… On the other hand colour of skin, pigment, land boundaries, habitual cultural practices, social class and so forth are secondary and non-essential.

The problems of our world come into play when in the minds of some group a secondary aspect is either the focus or the cause of a conflict or issue. The outcome, as we know, can be devastating, and can be easily exemplified by surveying the world news on any given day. Sometimes the cause is purely prejudice itself, as with Canada’s traditional treatment of Aboriginals, or the South African legacy. In these cases, problems accumulate around the given separative idea. In other cases strong emotions use prejudices as a scapegoat; for example, two years ago in Toronto the ‘increased racial tensions’ were fed in part by low employment; an equity official commenting on the blame of foreigners for ‘taking our jobs’ stated: “it is easy to have racial equity when there’s work for all”. Many signs of ‘increasing racism’ are caused by this scapegoating today. Equally strong are lingering grievance over past and present exploitations.

Lastly, there is sheer selfish brutality and ignorance, which will use any excuse to attain its aims. We see this in Somalia – where the term “warlord” apparently justifies the actions causing death by starvation to unnumbered countrymen, women and children. To the fair minded, “warlord” is just another word for criminal, but the lingering romance of humanity’s most totally destructive practice, is supposed to make it justifiable. Such conditions recall the analogy by Baha’i world community’s exemplary figure Abdu’l Baha who likened ignorance for the mind to the desert’s effect on the body.

It is undeniable that specific causes for the progress and chaos in daily life stem directly from how each one of us views humanity. Hence the principle of unity in diversity makes a vital difference, and its realization or neglect has everything to do with what shows up on our TV screen each night.

Recently, as a result of reading and thinking about these criteria of present progress, it has become clear to me that the most essential commonalities of humankind are the moral-ethical virtues or spiritual-material codes of excellence in our conduct. In fact, the moral and ethical dimension is as much a natural part of the human environment as the sun and oxygen are natural to the vegetative environment of the planet.

I began to rethink older ideas of justice; that aside from cases where cultural significances are too obscure to understand – that justice is our understanding of what is fair in a collective social context. The context may change but the concept is a constancy. For example in North American Native societies, the notion of ownership and property makes not much sense. If I have a chainsaw, and my neighbour wants to use it he does, then maybe a second party might want to use it .., and I look for it a month later and find it in the hands of a third person. This form of sharing, in white society, is called theft, and has been often so judged by us. However, when contexts are clear, we can respect the element of fairness in both systems.

The appearance of justice in the human sphere can be squelched by ignorance, oppression, or blindness to true causes of a situation. As an example of progress, it is a significant sign that 50 years later a people who bought into the policies of Hitler can assemble over a third of a million people to confront fascism in their midst. It exemplifies that what takes place in the moral intellectual environment affects what follows in the collective world.

Finally, how do we reconcile that religion, supposedly the source of human excellence and virtue in the moral-social ethical milieu, is equally culpable in its history for oppression and injustice ? Research shows that all the religious founders exemplified justice and fairness and exhorted us to these and many other spiritual qualities and social virtues. If anyone should directly read their writings and not take hearsay for an answer, they would be astonished by the consummate beauty, spirituality, call to virtue and conduct common to all, and to the loftiness and divine connection of their claims. Their persons first hand don’t seem that different in topic and insight, yet each is claimed exclusive (not by themselves) but by their followers. Evidently selfish motives, limitations, and ignorance obscure this primal luminosity. The true university of human understanding is, I feel, not expressed in dogmatic strictures, but rather in the practice of the virtues and qualities these founders showed us.

We need only ask what would have happened if any of the religions of our past peoples had concentrated on practice of virtues and refrained from attempting to dictate the meaning of things beyond the limited court of human judgement. In short, to have believed in a Divine Teacher, then to have pronounced on things divine, while neglecting to act virtuously toward all, is the principle area of failure to reach universality in religious history. Conversely, restraint from dogmatic pronouncement, and channelling one’s faith through the practice of virtuous actions taught by the founders, has been and will continue to be the greatest source of spiritual authenticity, social well-being and intellectual balance.

As a Baha’i commemorating the 100th anniversary of the passing of Baha’u’llah, whom I believe to be the latest of humanity’s God-sent teachers, and who has made it absolutely clear that today the covenant of God with humanity is to be expressed through an unity of all humanity, destined to emerge by the common will of all peoples … I can only pray that faith in our modern world will be expressed of genuine magnanimity of spirit. For, how in a world where the physical sciences exhibit a unity beyond human tampering, can we believe that spiritual reality, more primary than the physical, can condone divisions and conflict? I am convinced that a great change in our conceptions of religion will be part of the process of the maturing of humanity.

I believe that we have been given everything we need, from divine guidance to physical resources, and that our creator then leaves the rest up to us. It is what we believe and understand, then what we do, that determine our progress. We have much reason to expect visible changes for the better, even in our own lifetime.

Baha’is Recognize Importance of Religious Accord
Niels Hodsman
Volume 3 #4 1994
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

World Religion Day falls annually on the third Sunday of January. In Guelph area, this year’s host, the Baha’i Community, invited special guests Mayor John Counsell and University of Guelph Director, Dr. John Black, as well as representatives from academic and religious circles, and the public-at-large. In all, about one hundred people attended.

The event began with a presentation covering three themes: it showed the underlying oneness of humanity on our ever-shrinking planet; next, quotations from the Founders of the world’s religions were movingly narrated by children. This section illustrated quite clearly the common spiritual and moral themes of the world’s great spiritual Teachers. Finally, one young narrator concluded his presentation with a closing paragraph around the statement that world peace is not only possible but inevitable.

The common ground among the world’s religions is still generally not recognized, because most of us have inquired no further than the usual stereotypical statements made about other religions from our own background. When the writings of the Founders are read consecutively, the similarity is surprisingly obvious. That night it caused Mayor John Counsell to remark in his closing comments, “I never knew that the religions of the world were so close”.

To exemplify this common ground the following are excerpts from more lengthy quotations of the world’s scriptures, quoted that evening:

From the Hindu writings:
“Do not to others what you would not wish done to yourself; and wish for others too, what ye long for and desire for yourself. This is the whole of the Sharma, heed it well”

From the Jewish teachings:
“What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour .. Behold how good and pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together”

From the Buddhist teachings:
“In five ways should a clansman minister to his friends … By generosity, courtesy, and benevolence … By treating them as he treats himself, and by being as good as his word”

From the Christian teachings:
“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it. Thou shall love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commands hang all the law of the prophets”

From the Islamic teachings:
“Whatever you abhor for yourself, abhor it also for others .. and whatever you desire for yourself, desire also for others .. and whose maketh efforts forUs, in Our ways will We guide them: For God is assuredly with those who do righteous deeds”

From the Baha’i teachings:
“Ascribe not to any soul that which thou wouldst not have ascribed to thee, and say not that which thou doest not .. Oh my friend, listen with heart and soul to the songs of the Spirit, and treasure them as thine own eyes”

And from North American Native teachings:
“Grandfather, Great Spirit. All over the world the faces of living ones are alike. With tenderness they have come out of the ground. Look upon Your children that they may face the winds and walk the good road to the Day of Quiet … So, live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart”

These quotes are mostly concerned with how we treat each other. But if we were to compare statements about our relation to God, or about the nature of these Wise Ones, themselves, we would find more similarity.

During the reception, Joseph Woods, a local Baha’i working towards a Masters in religious studies, said “The underlying unity of the world’s religions is still not known by most people. We have a tradition of opposing each other and finding difference, but first hand investigation shows this is not the whole truth

This common ethical and spiritual foundation was, officially recognized last summer by theologians and religious leaders attending the World Parliament of Religions, convened one hundred years after its incepetion in 1893. They drafted a statement pointing out the common ethical and spiritual foundations upon which the world’s religions rest. In my personal view, I find the utter exclusivity of Divine primacy, ascribed by the followers of each world religion to its own Founder, difficult to believe. I seriously doubt that They would agree with Their own followers’ claims of secondary or false status for other Great Teachers.

In any case, increased accord among the world’s various believers means a better respect and mutuality, much needed as we advance into the years ahead. It will make fighting for religious motives less easy to accept on the part of bystanders, and harder to justify on the part of perpetrators. Of more enduring importance, it strengthens the ties between all peoples.

If we look at the cause of conflicts large or small, we will find a self-centered viewpoint or prejudice supporting that stand, be it political, national, racial, ethnic, economic, religious and so forth. It seems no area of human awareness is exempt from this distortion. Conversely, when we look at the origin of all advances towards equity, peace and stability made in this century, we find them based on the belief in a justice and equity founded on our common humanity.

Doesn’t that tell us something as we move into the 21st century? It seems to me that separative and self-centered collective ideas are the true enemies of humanity, long before we reach the battlefield or draw blood in the streets. On the other hand, ideas which promote human unity at this crucial time in our history are the creative foundation of novel and stable solutions to collective life. Far from being a vague idea, the oneness of humanity is the working notion behind actual progress.

There is a second aspect to working with differences and with commonality. This as the habit of force and violence over the habit of dialogue and consultative discussion. Though I know that self-centered prejudice feeds abuse and violence, I feel that violence is a separate issue, at the very least an immature, and otherwise a perverse habit which we must outgrow.

This point is well illustrated by the findings of Freedom House, a New-York based research company. They tell us that in 1991, for the first time in this century, half the world’s governments were democratic, with 31 more nations in the process of transformation to democracy. Their point was not that democracy itself is the ideal form of government or that it is perfect. Rather, they point out that no two democratic countries have ever gone to war with each other in this century. The reason, they say, is that they prefer to talk things through, to listen to one another.

This seems important. It dramatically demonstrates that speaking and listening to each other is the key to working through the many transitions which a more unified planetary civilization will have to face. Economic restructuring, environmental balance and social evolution are crying out for more co-operation and action on a global scale. Obviously, if we combine a conviction of human commonality, with a commitment to co-operative consultation, the process will accelerate. This is to say that the world needs a new spiritual awakening, for to see humanity as one people and eschew violence is basically to adopt an expansive open or spiritual attitude.

In this light, it is tragic that the source of human moral and spiritual motivation, the earth’s religious heritage, lags behind the world it so desperately need to inspire. Hence, a closer tie among religions is heartening. As a Baha’i, I believe it is another step on the road to a golden age, when the essential oneness of existence. reflecting the oneness of God, enshrined within moral precepts for the individual, finds expression in collective institutions which will banish war, suffering and conflicts, and foster a unified stability that will release the many potentials which human co-operation is able to generate. World Religion Day was made to help inspire a more unified spirit toward this, our brightest future together

 

2017 October 200th anniversary of Bahaullah MITRA

Inspired by the life and teachings of Bahá’u’lláh
millions of people worldwide will celebrate the 200th anniversary
of His birth on the 21st and 22nd of October 2017

Bah’u’llah was born in Tehran 1817.Two centuries later,the day of His birth is celebrated around the world alongside the birth of the forerunner of His Revelation, the Báb, born in 1819 on the day before the birth of Baha’u’llah. These twin twin holy birthdays are celebrated by Baháis and their friends as one annual festival where the closely interwoven lives and missions of these two divine lights are remembered together. This October launches a 2-year period of enriched Baha’i activities, culminating with the 200th anniversary of the Birth of the Bab, the forerunner and herald of Baha’u’llah, in October of 2019. Baháis around the world are expressing spirituality through thousands of service projects, the arts, and coming together with friends and neighbours.

This is the essence of Baha’u’llah’s teachings:

“The fundamental purpose animating the Faith of God and His Religion is to safeguard the interests and promote the unity of the human race, and to foster the spirit of love and fellowship amongst men”– Baha’u’llah

Bahá’ís believe that all humanity is one family; that men and women are equal; all prejudices must be extinguished; individuals must investigate truth independently; science and religion are in harmony; economic problems are linked to spiritual problems, the family and its unity are crucial; there is one God and all major religions are sent from God and World peace is vital!

The mightiest proof of the greatness of Bahá’u’lláh and His divine mission lies in His hundreds of Writings which streamed from His Pen like a torrential rain during a period of no less than forty years of uninterrupted revelation.

The Universal House Justice to the Baháis, explains the significance of this day for the Baháis around the world in the following statement:

“In every era of history, that unknowable Reality has opened the gates of grace to the world by sending an Emissary charged with providing the moral and spiritual stimulus that human beings need to cooperate and advance. Many of the names of these great Lights to humankind are lost. But some shine out from the annals of the past as having revolutionized thought, unlocked stores of knowledge, and inspired the rise of civilizations, and Their names continue to be honoured and praised. Each of these spiritual and social visionaries, stainless mirrors of virtue, set out teachings and truths that answered the urgent needs of the age. As the world now faces its most pressing challenges yet, we acclaim Bahá’u’lláh, born two hundred years ago, as such a Figure—indeed, as the One Whose teachings will usher in that long-promised time when all humanity will live side by side in peace and unity. From His early youth, Bahá’u’lláh was regarded by those who knew Him as bearing the imprint of destiny. Blessed with saintly character and uncommon wisdom, He seemed to be touched by heaven’s kindly light. Yet He was made to endure forty years of suffering, including successive exiles and incarcerations at the decree of two despotic monarchs, campaigns to vilify His name and condemn His followers, violence upon His Person, shameful attempts on His life—all of which, out of a boundless love for humanity, He bore willingly, with radiance and forbearance, and with compassion for His tormentors. Even the expropriation of all His worldly possessions left Him unperturbed. An observer might wonder why One Whose love for others was so complete should have been made the target of such hostility, given that He had otherwise been the object of universal praise and admiration, famed for His benevolence and high-mindedness, and had disavowed any claim to political power. To anyone who is familiar with the pattern of history, the reason for His ordeals is, of course, unmistakable. The appearance of a prophetic Figure in the world has invariably given rise to ferocious opposition from wielders of power. But the light of truth will not be put out. And so, in the lives of these transcendent Beings one finds sacrifice, heroism and, come what may, deeds that exemplify Their words. The same is evident in each phase of the life of Bahá’u’lláh. In spite of every hardship, He was never silenced, and His words retained their compelling potency — words spoken with the voice of insight, diagnosing the world’s ills and prescribing the remedy”

Baháis around the world are learning how to give effect to His teachings. The youth are becoming ever more conscious of their spiritual identity and are directing their energies towards the advancement of their societies. From villages, neighbourhoods, towns and cities communities, and individuals are dedicated to working together. On this two hundredth anniversary of Bahá’u’lláh’s appearance, Baháis have a simple invitation: seize this opportunity to find out who He was and what He represents.

The Baháis in The Waterloo Region are celebrating this event with many different large and small gatherings in their homes and communities, from Oct. 20 to 22 this month.

For more information about this sacred celebration and the Bahái faith, please visit the following sites:

There have been many tributes for this event, from many world leaders for this occasion

https://bicentenary.bahai.org/public-messages-tributes

This is a 30 minute presentation of Bahá’u’llah’s life:

For local events email:
waterloobahai@yahoo.ca

http://www.bahai.org
http://www.bahai.org/bahaullah/
https